Manchester plan process under scrutiny
June 12, 2008 · Updated 9:22 AM
Manchester residents who gathered on Tuesday for one of the last meetings before the areas Community Plan is handed off to the Kitsap County commissioners seemed more interested in the process than building heights and design standards.
The attendees responded, either against or in solidarity with, comments made by Lary Coppola, Kitsap County Planning Commission member and candidate for mayor of Port Orchard, who said proper notice was not given for the process of developing the plan.
I never received any notification, any postcards or anything, Coppola said in response to comments from Manchester resident Carrilu Thompson. If it wasnt for my participation on this board, I would not have known about it.
Several Manchester residents present, including Linda Jacobs, agreed.
I just dont believe that people dont want Manchester to be a viable place where you want to live, where you can get a quart of milk, Jacobs said. I just feel this has been rammed through.
Two mailings went out to Manchester residents encouraging them to take part in the process, but Coppola said he never received anything.
Thompson said the group has made every effort to reach the public, including holding a booth at the Fathers Day Salmon Bake, and said questioning the ethics of the process was a slam against those who have been involved.
Ray Pardo also disagreed with Coppolas assessment.
If you didnt know what was going on in this town, you werent in Manchester for the last nine months, Pardo said.
Coppola replied that he had not been in Manchester, having changed his official residence to Port Orchard in order to campaign for mayor.
In addition to the discussion over process, residents and developers also echoed their sentiments over the plan, which limits mixed-use developments in Manchester to 28 feet.
I think what weve got is a very viable, very good plan, Manchester resident Carol Leininger said. I think what weve done is good for the community.
Planning and design consultant, William Palmer, who has worked on the controversial three-story Colchester Commons, argued again for a flat height limit without limitations on the number of stories.
I think it ought to be 35 feet across the board, Palmer said.
It was the last meeting to take in-person public comment, but anyone wishing to weigh in on this document before it goes to the Kitsap County Commissioners can e-mail Katrina Knutson at kknutson@co.kitsap.wa.us by October 31.
The Planning Commission will meet again on Nov. 13 at 9 a.m. to discuss the plan.
Visit www.kitsapgov.com/dcd and click on Kitsap County Sub-Area Plans on the lower portion of the page.
Comment on this story.
So keep your comments:
- Civil
- Smart
- On-topic
- Free of profanity
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

