PSRC listened to and ignored our concerns
June 12, 2008 · Updated 4:15 PM
The hubris of the Puget Sound Regional Council was on full display for Kitsap County residents attending the groups public meeting last week in Port Orchard. As were all the reasons the county needs to ends its participation in PSRC immediately.
About 80 Kitsap residents showed up for the meeting in the commissioners chambers, and many of those on hand professed some affiliation with the Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners which is to say they have strong feelings on the subjects of property rights and Kitsap Countys involvement in a quasi-governmental agency whose leadership and mission is heavily skewed toward King Countys interests rather than Kitsaps.
Following the meeting, PSRC Director of Growth Management Planning Norman Abbott dismissed the spirited objections and criticisms raised by the attendees, saying they represented a minority opinion. His assessment was shared by by Poulsbo City Councilman Dale Rudolph, who moderated the session.
Planning helps to preserve rural life, he said. Listening to some of this testimony would make you believe the opposite.
Actually, it would make you believe the residents of Kitsap County would prefer to have a strong voice in shaping the strategies that directly affect them rather than abdicating their responsibility to an organization in which they only have 3 percent of the say.
More to the point, were flabbergasted that PSRCs director and apparently some here in Kitsap County could be so dismissive of the views expressed at a meeting sponsored by the organization at the request of the Kitsap County commissioners.
The gathering was well-publicized and those who opted to attend were obviously passionate about the matters at hand. And they expressed their views. How is that different in any meaningful way from the results of an election held in our representative democracy?
You give people a chance to participate, and when they do you accept the results. You dont discount them based on your own biases and preconceptions about what you believe they should think.
PSRC came to Kitsap County ostensibly to find out what residents here want. But when our opinions didnt coincide with those held by the leaders of the organization and its cadre of local supporters, we were blown off.
If this is any indication of the esteem with which Kitsap County is viewed within the hallowed walls of the PSRC, perhaps it would be better not to participate at all.
That seems to be the opinion of South Kitsap Commissioner Jan Angel the only county commissioner who attended Tuesdays meeting. She later said she would vote to resign from the PSRC and share planning strategies with other rural counties that have more in common with Kitsap.
In order for this to happen, however, she will need to convince at least one of her fellow commissioners to support such a move.
Both Central Kitsap Commissioner Josh Brown and North Kitsaps Steve Bauer professed to be open to withdrawing from the organization, but only if they could be shown doing so would make more sense than continuing membership.
Well give Angels colleagues the benefit of the doubt and assume they were sincere in this expression. The only mystery to us is how they could hear the accounts of how the Kitsap meeting attendees were snubbed and not already have concluded its our continued affiliation with PSRC, not the idea of withdrawing from it, that makes no sense.
Comment on this story.
So keep your comments:
- Civil
- Smart
- On-topic
- Free of profanity
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

