Opinion

Howling Wolf coverage biased, sensationalized

I recently read an article in your newspaper entitled “Wolf’s ‘howling’ days over” and another entitled, “Confusion Over Howling Wolf Continues” by Elizabeth Williams. Simply put, I found them to be extremely unfortunate articles.

I am more than a little surprised they were printed as news stories, even in a small, local paper. They seemed to me to be misleading, and extremely one-sided.

Despite “more than a dozen complaints,” Ms. Williams quotes only one local resident throughout both articles. This anonymous female stated, “The noise was so bad, I really thought my eardrums would burst.” This could not possibly be anything more than a gross exaggeration and does not stand up to even the most cursory examination.

Really, how loud would it have had to be inside the venue for it to have caused pain across the street? Did the local ER experience an unusually high number of admissions that night for bleeding ears, hearing loss, headaches, etc.?

Is one expected to believe that it was louder across the street in a parking lot than it is in an average venue (in which few choose to wear hearing protection)?

One would think Ms. Williams could have chosen a different person to quote, had she wished to do so.

Ms. Williams also quotes an officer who was present that night regarding the nature of the profanity. This officer states “When I was there, it was so bad I didn’t even put it in writing (in the report).”

I recognize that you have no control over your local police force, but I find it odd that this statement apparently did not trouble Ms. Williams. This officer is a professional. What happens to the chain of evidence in the event he is called to a murder scene?

If the victim were mutilated, would he want to put that in his report? Should not police reports be somewhat consistent and predictable, irrespective of the officer’s personal feelings or nature of the incident?

Ms. Williams wrote, “Police immediately hauled the band off the stage and told its members the city would shut the concert down if they kept using that kind of language.” I was wondering if Ms. Williams obtained the police reports for the evening. I ask because this is inconsistent with my experience in dealing with the police regarding noise complaint issues during the years that I was in property management.

Additionally, I have read feedback from some of the people present at the amphitheatre that night who insist that no one was made to quit playing for any reason other than the end of their allotted time slot.

The same people also state that there were no arrests during the event (for example, no arrests for drunk and disorderly‚ no fights, etc.)

It was my understanding that most noise ordinances have clearly defined decibel levels and in order to prosecute, or even shut something down, police would have to measure those levels in some way — if for no other reason than to present as evidence.

Additionally, if a law regarding profanity in this application exists and was broken by the performers, why would Ms. Williams have not mentioned it? Certainly, that would have been in keeping with the tone and angle‚ of her story.

I do not know why these stories troubles me so deeply. I understand the need for citizens to decide what they do and do not want in their neighborhood, the desire to let others know what is going on in one’s neighborhood and even righteous indignation over something of which one disapproves in the extreme. And I recognize the importance of the news media in facilitating this process.

It seems to me, however, that this story bends truths and sensationalizes almost to the level of common gossip. It tarnishes the image and reputation of your police force and sheds an extremely negative light on your residents. I do not understand that.

I am a 34-year-old married female and I listen to heavy metal, rock and goth. When my husband and I attend an event outside of our immediate area, we patronize the local establishments — snacks, gas, etc. I cannot imagine that I am alone.

Metal is not the moneymaker that pop and hip-hop can be. It is difficult for us to find venues and promoters that will present these shows, being that they are less lucrative (though no less vulgar) than “popular” music. It would be a shame if “more than a dozen” extremely vocal people were allowed to shut down another of our venues and potentially deprive your small town of revenue.

Carrie Crisman is a

Port Orchard resident

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the Nov 28
Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Browse the archives.

Friends to Follow

View All Updates